06
Sep
08

And yet people STILL stand behind her…

AP writer Jim Kuhnhenn reports:

JIM KUHNHENN, Associated Press Writer Jim Kuhnhenn, Associated Press Writer Wed Sep 3, 11:48 pm ET

ST. PAUL, Minn. – Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and her Republican supporters held back little Wednesday as they issued dismissive attacks on Barack Obama and flattering praise on her credentials to be vice president. In some cases, the reproach and the praise stretched the truth.

Some examples:

PALIN: “I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending … and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. I told the Congress ‘thanks but no thanks’ for that Bridge to Nowhere.”

THE FACTS: As mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a lobbyist and traveled to Washington annually to support earmarks for the town totaling $27 million. In her two years as governor, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation. While Palin notes she rejected plans to build a $398 million bridge from Ketchikan to an island with 50 residents and an airport, that opposition came only after the plan was ridiculed nationally as a “bridge to nowhere.”

PALIN: “There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it’s easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state senate.”

THE FACTS: Compared to McCain and his two decades in the Senate, Obama does have a more meager record. But he has worked with Republicans to pass legislation that expanded efforts to intercept illegal shipments of weapons of mass destruction and to help destroy conventional weapons stockpiles. The legislation became law last year. To demean that accomplishment would be to also demean the work of Republican Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, a respected foreign policy voice in the Senate. In Illinois, he was the leader on two big, contentious measures in Illinois: studying racial profiling by police and requiring recordings of interrogations in potential death penalty cases. He also successfully co-sponsored major ethics reform legislation.

PALIN: “The Democratic nominee for president supports plans to raise income taxes, raise payroll taxes, raise investment income taxes, raise the death tax, raise business taxes, and increase the tax burden on the American people by hundreds of billions of dollars.”

THE FACTS: The Tax Policy Center, a think tank run jointly by the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, concluded that Obama’s plan would increase after-tax income for middle-income taxpayers by about 5 percent by 2012, or nearly $2,200 annually. McCain’s plan, which cuts taxes across all income levels, would raise after tax-income for middle-income taxpayers by 3 percent, the center concluded.

Obama would provide $80 billion in tax breaks, mainly for poor workers and the elderly, including tripling the Earned Income Tax Credit for minimum-wage workers and higher credits for larger families.

He also would raise income taxes, capital gains and dividend taxes on the wealthiest. He would raise payroll taxes on taxpayers with incomes above $250,000, and he would raise corporate taxes. Small businesses that make more than $250,000 a year would see taxes rise.

MCCAIN: “She’s been governor of our largest state, in charge of 20 percent of America’s energy supply … She’s responsible for 20 percent of the nation’s energy supply. I’m entertained by the comparison and I hope we can keep making that comparison that running a political campaign is somehow comparable to being the executive of the largest state in America,” he said in an interview with ABC News’ Charles Gibson.

THE FACTS: McCain’s phrasing exaggerates both claims. Palin is governor of a state that ranks second nationally in crude oil production, but she’s no more “responsible” for that resource than President Bush was when he was governor of Texas, another oil-producing state. In fact, her primary power is the ability to tax oil, which she did in concert with the Alaska Legislature. And where Alaska is the largest state in America, McCain could as easily have called it the 47th largest state — by population.

MCCAIN: “She’s the commander of the Alaska National Guard. … She has been in charge, and she has had national security as one of her primary responsibilities,” he said on ABC.

THE FACTS: While governors are in charge of their state guard units, that authority ends whenever those units are called to actual military service. When guard units are deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, for example, they assume those duties under “federal status,” which means they report to the Defense Department, not their governors. Alaska’s national guard units have a total of about 4,200 personnel, among the smallest of state guard organizations.

FORMER ARKANSAS GOV. MIKE HUCKABEE: Palin “got more votes running for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska than Joe Biden got running for president of the United States.”

THE FACTS: A whopper. Palin got 616 votes in the 1996 mayor’s election, and got 909 in her 1999 re-election race, for a total of 1,525. Biden dropped out of the race after the Iowa caucuses, but he still got 76,165 votes in 23 states and the District of Columbia where he was on the ballot during the 2008 presidential primaries.

FORMER MASSACHUSETTS GOV. MITT ROMNEY: “We need change, all right — change from a liberal Washington to a conservative Washington! We have a prescription for every American who wants change in Washington — throw out the big-government liberals, and elect John McCain and Sarah Palin.”

THE FACTS: A Back-to-the-Future moment. George W. Bush, a conservative Republican, has been president for nearly eight years. And until last year, Republicans controlled Congress. Only since January 2007 have Democrats have been in charge of the House and Senate.

___

Associated Press Writer Jim Drinkard in Washington contributed to this report.


9 Responses to “And yet people STILL stand behind her…”


  1. 1 sgtsquarepants
    September 6, 2008 at 10:26 pm

    Jim, you really need to do a better job of doing your homework. Your piece is FILLED with incaccuries and outright lies. I’ve read some of your work before and thought you seemed like an intelligent person. This piece is VERY disappointing. I’d urge EVERYONE who reads this piece and check out each Jim’s allegations which are easily debunked.

  2. 2 sgtsquarepants
    September 6, 2008 at 10:29 pm

    And thank you Tim for posting this which greatly helps the conservative cause. It’s writers like Jim who are infuriating mainstream Americans with their vitrial, hatred and lies.

  3. September 6, 2008 at 10:58 pm

    Sarah Palin: Sincere but misinformed

    I like Sarah Palin. She is sincere and full of energy. But she is woefully misinformed.

    No sex education! Whoops! Teenager has a baby!
    Shouldn’t that be a clue?
    Brother-in-law is harassing her sister. Palin pulls strings to get him fired. Is that going too far?
    Doesn’t like some of the books in the local library. She asks the librarian if she would mind removing certain books. The librarian indicates she will not tolerate censorship. Palin gets her fired.

    The common thread here is the self-appointed assumption that what I (Palin) decide is better for you than what you decide. Ohh, that smacks of totalitarianism! Too bad it hasn’t worked, doesn’t work, and won’t work in the future. Most amazing of all (and tragic) is that some people don’t like to think for themselves. They are mentally lazy, and oh-so willing to let others make these crucial decisions for them. You could see a few mindless drones waving flags and cheering her at the Republican Convention.

    Reminds of the Stockholm syndrome. The captives after a while begin to idolize their kidnappers. “I’m going to restrict
    what you can say and do, but trust me, this will be good for you!” Yeah! Pit-bull with lipstick!
    (And the crowd goes wild!)

  4. 4 Tim
    September 6, 2008 at 11:05 pm

    Srgsqrpants, I thank you for criticizing Jim’s piece because it is people like you that help the Democratic party by proving that repub’s are too scared of the truth.
    Happy weekend.

  5. September 7, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    Srgsqrpants – I think it’s fine that you criticize Jim Kuhnhenn’s work. I have no problem with you claiming that his article is inaccurate. What I have a problem with is that your claim is then not substantiated with facts that counter his article. Jim presents many arguments and supports them with information that he is asserting is accurate and researched. However, you come and comment on the piece and say it’s filled with inaccuracies but do not identify the alleged inaccuracies. Your argument, therefore, has no foundation and is simply an accusation unsubstantiated. As an attorney, I cannot accept your allegations without factual evidence to support your claim. In the future, by all means, tell us what you think. But unless you can beef it up with facts, your allegations will be merely meaningless, angry blather.

  6. 6 xtrekker
    September 7, 2008 at 7:48 pm

    Check and AH’MATE! That’s why I get all my information from THE BEST F#&KING NEWS TEAM EVER, The Daily Show (maybe not ALL information but certainly some of the most brilliant gems). Say what you will but these guys are friggin geniuses! And with all the “We need change” suddenly that’s coming from the McCain camp…check out the similarities between McCain’s speech and another GREAT candidate.

    http://www.indecision2008.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184111

    Oh and if you don’t like Jim Kuhnhenn here’s an article from The Economist that’s worth a glance at:
    http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12060464

  7. September 8, 2008 at 5:16 am

    xtrekker – The Block FM loves the Daily Show!!! :) Here are our main sources of information – The Economist, The Atlantic Monthly, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Nation, Newsweek, The BBC, and…Daily/Colbert :) hehehehe keep those links and comments comin’!

  8. 8 sgtsquarepants
    November 11, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    Cassie if you’re an attorney, I sincerely feel sorry for anyone that would hire you. You claim I blathered on angrily with no facts while defending the article that was AN OPINION PIECE, lol.

  9. November 20, 2008 at 3:31 pm

    sgtsquarpants – an opinion piece does not mean that there are no FACTS involved. go back and read the article and you’ll see that there are FACTS all throughout. All commentaries and opinion pieces have as their foundation some factual issues. So now you’ve attacked the article and my professional abilities still with no substantiation. If Jim’s allegations are so easily debunked, why didn’t you debunk them here so that all our readers could understand better?


Leave a Reply




Just a Friendly Reminder

Content on this site is protected by American copyright laws. Please add a live link to this blog when quoting material.

TWITTER @TheBlockFM

 

September 2008
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Archives